Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

[Hair Stylist Woes] Ryan, a college student, went to see his hair stylist, Melissa. Ryan, who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Melissa told him that she could make those changes, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Melissa made the changes, but Ryan did not do the upkeep required. Ryan proceeded to falsely claim that Melissa did not do what Ryan asked her to do, that Melissa lied to him, and that Melissa was professionally incompetent. Ryan made the statements about Melissa to friends of his. He also wrote a letter to his college newspaper saying that Melissa's shop should be avoided at all costs because Melissa was incompetent. In fact, Melissa was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Ryan started his criticism. Melissa threatened to sue Ryan for defamation, but Ryan told Melissa that she could not prevail because she could not prove loss of income. Melissa had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked for weeks ahead. -As far as the letter to the newspaper is concerned, which of the following is true in regards to Ryan's statement that Melissa cannot recover because she cannot show loss of income?


A) Ryan is correct.
B) Ryan is correct only if he can establish that he did not intend to cause economic loss to Melissa.
C) Ryan is incorrect because his actions would be considered libel per se.
D) Ryan is incorrect because general damages would be presumed.
E) Ryan is incorrect because Melissa has proven special damages.

F) C) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following would constitute the privacy tort of false light?


A) Attributing characteristics or beliefs to a person that he or she does not possess.
B) Disclosing private facts about a person in order to obtain some sort of personal gain.
C) Defaming a person with actual malice.
D) Defaming a public figure.
E) Defaming a public figure for personal gain.

F) A) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Proving that consent occurred is a defense to battery.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Carlos, who has a large trust fund, is angry with Isabel because she stopped dating him. Isabel ran a successful dog grooming shop, but Carlos decided to open a dog grooming shop next door and charge less than it would take to make a profit, solely to run her out of business. Which of the following is correct?


A) Carlos has committed the tort of unfair competition.
B) Carlos has committed the tort of interference with contract.
C) Carlos has committed the tort of unfair competition and also the tort of interference with contract.
D) Carlos has committed the tort of disparagement.
E) Carlos has not committed any tort.

F) B) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Nominal damages are trivial damages intended to recognize that a defendant committed a tort against the plaintiff.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Defense of property cannot be a defense to a claim of battery.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following would constitute false imprisonment?


A) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; or physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; but not moral pressure.
B) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; or moral pressure; but not refusing to release property.
C) Physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; but not threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; or moral pressure.
D) Threatening to use immediate physical force to detain someone; refusing to release property; physical restraint, such as tying someone to a chair; and moral pressure.
E) Physical restraint; threatening to use immediate physical force; but not refusing to release property; or moral pressure.

F) All of the above
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a court awards $1 million to compensate an injured plaintiff for medical bills, loss of wages, and pain and suffering, this is an example of compensatory damages.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Explain the concept of absolute privilege in the context of defamation and set forth the two situations listed in the text in which it is applied. Discuss whether you believe each category of absolute privilege should be eliminated.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When an absolute privilege exists, one c...

View Answer

What law gives immunity to providers of interactive computer services for liability they might otherwise incur because of material disseminated by them but created by others?


A) The Internet Communications Act of 2000.
B) The Interactive Computer Services Protection Act of 2004.
C) The Communications Decency Act of 1996.
D) The Internet Communications Protection Act of 1998.
E) The Blog Protection Act of 2001.

F) None of the above
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Matt intends to throw a baseball at Jamal and hit Jamal in the head with the ball because he missed an easy fly ball hit to him in the field. Jamal is standing directly next to Sally in the dugout. Matt throws the baseball but hits Sally in the head instead of Jamal. What type of tort did Matt commit against Sally?


A) No tort was committed, Jamal was Matt's target not Sally.
B) The tort of negligence because Matt only intended to harm Jamal.
C) An accidental tort because Matt struck Sally by mistake.
D) An intentional tort because even though Matt meant to hit Jamal, he still caused harm by hitting Sally.
E) A strict liability tort occurred because throwing a baseball is inherently dangerous.

F) None of the above
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Torts can be classified into three classifications in the U.S.: intentional, accidental and negligence.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Why does public figure privilege exist?


A) To give special protections from defamation to public figures since they are in the public eye and their reputations matter more to them than the average person.
B) To encourage free discussion about public figures.
C) To discourage discussion about politicians so democracy can function in a more orderly fashion.
D) To allow people to make up stories about politicians and celebrities because these public figures are people of interest to the public.
E) To prevent people from making a profit by slandering public figures.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A business is upset about the tactics that a competitor is employing to gain business and sues the business. The plaintiff was not necessarily harmed in any way, but the court finds that a tort was committed and awards the plaintiff $10 in damages. This $10 in damages is an example of what type of damages?


A) Nominal
B) Compensatory
C) Punitive
D) Retaliatory
E) Revenge

F) None of the above
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Hair Stylist Woes] Ryan, a college student, went to see his hair stylist, Melissa. Ryan, who had black, curly hair, requested straight, blond hair. Melissa told him that she could make those changes, but that there would be significant upkeep involved. Melissa made the changes, but Ryan did not do the upkeep required. Ryan proceeded to falsely claim that Melissa did not do what Ryan asked her to do, that Melissa lied to him, and that Melissa was professionally incompetent. Ryan made the statements about Melissa to friends of his. He also wrote a letter to his college newspaper saying that Melissa's shop should be avoided at all costs because Melissa was incompetent. In fact, Melissa was a good hair stylist and enjoyed a good reputation up until the time that Ryan started his criticism. Melissa threatened to sue Ryan for defamation, but Ryan told Melissa that she could not prevail because she could not prove loss of income. Melissa had to admit that while her reputation had been damaged somewhat and she felt embarrassed and humiliated, the damage was primarily among the college population. Her income kept increasing from other segments of the community, and she had suffered no net loss. All her appointment times were booked for weeks ahead. -In reference to the statements made to his friends, which of the following is true in regards to Ryan's remark that Melissa cannot recover because she has not suffered a loss of income?


A) Ryan is correct.
B) Ryan is correct only if he can show that he did not intend to cause Melissa loss of income.
C) Ryan is incorrect because his statements constituted slander per se.
D) Ryan is incorrect because special damages will be presumed.
E) Ryan is incorrect but only because Melissa cannot establish libel per se.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Lizzy and her boyfriend Bobby are at the local restaurant. The two have been arguing and Lizzy says she has had enough and turns to leave. Bobby, who is substantially bigger than Lizzy, draws back his hand as if to hit Lizzy. Lizzy turns around and ducks just in time to avoid Bobby's punch. What, if any, tort can Lizzy sue for?


A) Lizzy could sue for assault.
B) Lizzy could sue for battery.
C) Lizzy could sue for assault and battery.
D) Lizzy could sue for negligence since Bobby missed punching her.
E) Lizzy could not sue for a tort as no harm came from his threatening to punch her.

F) C) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Penny points a gun at Jose and threatens to shoot him. Jose is very brave and not frightened. The police arrive and Penny is arrested without shooting Jose. What tort did Penny commit?


A) Assault only
B) Battery only
C) Assault and battery
D) Assault, battery, and strict liability
E) Penny's conduct does not constitute an assault because Jose was not afraid.

F) All of the above
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

_______damages are a small amount of money given to recognize that a defendant did indeed commit a tort in a case in which there were no compensable damages suffered by the plaintiff.


A) Nominal
B) Compensatory
C) Punitive
D) Retaliatory
E) Revenge

F) B) and D)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A very wealthy defendant intentionally assaults his butler. The butler sues and the wealthy defendant is found to have committed a tort. The court decides to award punitive damages. In determining the amount of punitive damages, what are some factors that will be taken into account?


A) The severity of the wrongful conduct and the wealth of the defendant.
B) The fact the defendant is wealthy and that the victim was an employee.
C) The severity of the defendant's conduct and the fact the victim was an employee.
D) The length of service the butler provided to the defendant and the wealth of the defendant.
E) The wealth disparity between the butler and the wealthy defendant.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

[Pet Police] Min-ji breeds German Shepherd dogs. Daniel, who lives down the street, took in a stray dog loosely identified as a Corgi-plus. The dog, Casanova, would definitely be classified as a mixed breed. Daniel allowed Casanova to roam freely. Unfortunately, Casanova went to visit Min-ji's purebred German Shepherd. Mixed breed puppies resulted from the visit. Min-ji was incensed. She started a campaign to round up all of the stray dogs, including Casanova, and haul them off to the animal shelter. She picked up a few cats as well. She posted signs all over the neighborhood saying that no animal, neither dog, cat, nor fowl, should come into her yard and that she was going to begin shooting the next time an animal entered her property. Daniel and some of the other neighbors took offense. Daniel came to Min-ji's house while she was working in the yard. He walked behind her and shoved her. Min-ji did not see him coming. Min-ji turned around and proceeded to have a heated conversation with Daniel. Min-ji then drew her fist back and told Daniel that she was going to punch him in the nose. Min-ji raised back her arm and started to punch Daniel but he stepped back, and all she managed to do was jab him in the shoulder, causing no actual pain. Liz, who was walking by on the street, saw Min-ji attempting to hit Daniel. Liz came over and grabbed Min-ji's hands, pinning Min-ji 's hands behind her back. -Considering Daniel's shoving of Min-ji in the back, which of the following is true?


A) By shoving her in the back, Daniel committed a battery.
B) By shoving her in the back, Daniel committed a battery and an assault.
C) By shoving her in the back, Daniel committed an assault.
D) Daniel did not commit any torts because he did not actually physically harm Min-ji.
E) Daniel did not commit any torts because he can rely on the self-defense theory.

F) All of the above
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 90

Related Exams

Show Answer