A) Yes,Serena should have read the contract more carefully and,if there were any ambiguity,she should have clarified it prior to signing.
B) Yes,Section 29 should be interpreted according to its plain language.
C) Yes,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Serena.
D) No,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Flo.
E) Yes,Serena signed the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Being cordial in the negotiation of contracts.
B) The bargained-for exchange.
C) A contract negotiated in person as opposed to by telephone or e-mail.
D) Being cordial and refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts.
E) Refraining from unethical behavior in the negotiation of contracts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,because e-contracts are legally valid.
B) Yes.Since she paid the down payment,the contract was executory and e-contracts that are executory are void.
C) Yes,to be valid,she needed to print the form,sign in,and send it in.
D) No,an e-contract is voidable where there is no consideration.
E) Yes,although an e-contract is valid,it is voidable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) China has seven chapters of general provisions for contracts but also has chapters with special provisions for 15 different types of contracts.
B) China does not have laws regarding contracts.
C) China has general provisions for contracts,but no specific provisions for different types of contracts.
D) China's contacts laws are very similar to those of the United States.
E) China only follows international laws regarding contracts.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct because agreements for the sale of goods are based on a subjective theory.
B) She is correct because contract law is based upon a subjective theory of contracts.
C) She is correct because her genuinely held belief establishes that she did not commit fraud.
D) She is incorrect because her subjective belief would not be the basis for a determination of whether the contract would be enforced in this case and also because fraud is not necessary in order to find a breach of contract.
E) She is correct but only if Dylan subjectively believed the same as she did.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Section 29 is quoting a federal law that allows professionals in the flower business to select color.
B) The four corners rule.
C) The plain language rule.
D) The technical exemption law of the UCC.
E) General guidelines of contract interpretation.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Coherence
B) Agreement
C) Legal object
D) Concurrence
E) Alliance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,because the contract is illegal.
B) No,the contract is void because it is illegal.
C) No,the contract is voidable because it is illegal.
D) No,because the contract was not in writing.
E) Yes,if she paid him.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Documents produced electronically are legally valid,but not as valid as documents produced on paper.
B) E-contracts are formed electronically but executed when printed and signed.
C) ESIGN affirms e-contracts as legally valid.
D) ESIGN is international law.
E) ESIGN stands for the Electronic Signing In Great Numbers.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The contract was executory.
B) The contract was formal.
C) The contract was executed.
D) The contract was novated.
E) The contract was a recognizance contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Letter of credit
B) Letter of acknowledgement
C) Letter of agreement
D) Negotiated credit instrument letter
E) Letter of simple contract
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Bilateral;complete
B) Unilateral;bilateral
C) Unilateral;complete
D) Unilateral;trilateral
E) Bilateral;trilateral
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Interpretive
B) Unilateral
C) Appearing
D) Subjective
E) Objective
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) He was the offeree.
B) He was the assentee.
C) He was the assentor.
D) He was the offeree and the assentee.
E) He was the offeror.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Unilateral
B) Reasonable
C) Subjective
D) Mutual
E) Comprehensive
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Common law.
B) Both common law and the UCC.
C) Common law,because the UCC specifically excludes biological substances.
D) The UCC.
E) Neither common law not the UCC.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that the contract was properly entered into and was fully enforceable.
B) The court ruled in favor of Zappos on the basis that even though some provisions of the contract were unenforceable,because of the federal policy favoring arbitration agreements,the arbitration clause itself was enforceable.
C) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
D) The court ruled for the plaintiffs for the following two reasons: 1) there was no contract because plaintiffs did not assent to it,and 2) even if a contract existed,the contract was illusory and unenforceable because Zappos could avoid promises at any time.
E) The court ruled for the plaintiffs only because of its finding that no contract existed based on the plaintiffs' lack of assent.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Implied
B) Executed
C) Void
D) Executory
E) Voidable
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 89
Related Exams