Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $1,000
B) $100
C) $500
D) $5,000
E) $1,500
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Saleable things
B) Goods
C) Articles
D) Merchandise
E) Attachments
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court found that Felix DeWeldon was not a "merchant" because he is an individual.
B) The court found that,even though he recently sold paintings and was a collector,Felix DeWeldon was not a "merchant" because his occupation was not that of an art dealer.
C) The court found that Felix DeWeldon was not a "merchant" because his occupation was an artist and not an art dealer.
D) The court found that Felix DeWeldon was a "merchant" but only because the defendant viewed him as an art dealer.
E) The court found that Felix DeWeldon was a "merchant".
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Lessee
B) Acquirer
C) Buyer
D) Seller
E) Lessor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Specifically manufactured goods,admission,and modification.
B) Admission and partial-performance,but specifically manufactured goods must be in writing.
C) There are no exceptions for the statute of fraud's writing requirements.
D) Specifically manufactured goods,and admission,but there is no exception for partial performance.
E) Specifically manufactured goods,admission,and partial performance.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court will look to the specific industry standards in the UCC.
B) A "reasonable" quantity is supplied at the time of trial.
C) The court generally has no basis for determining a remedy.
D) A "reasonable" quantity is supplied at the time of delivery.
E) The court will decide the quantity.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only by electronic communication or by a writing.
B) By any reasonable means of communication.
C) Only orally or by a writing.
D) Only by facsimile or by mail.
E) Only by a writing.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court found for the buyer and awarded the lower price for deliveries until February 1,because the contract is between merchants,who are held to a higher standard of care.
B) The court found for the supplier and awarded the higher price for deliveries after January 1,because there were witnesses who supported the supplier's testimony.
C) The court found for the supplier and awarded the higher price for deliveries after January 1,based on the plain meaning of "adhered to for the year",the customer practice in the industry to raise prices January 1,and the fact that the buyer had actual notice of the price increase.
D) The court found for the buyer and split the price difference,because the contract is between merchants,who are held to a higher standard of care,but the buyer had actual notice of the price increase.
E) The court found for the buyer and awarded the lower price for deliveries until February 1,based on the plain meaning of "adhered to for a year".
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes,although the UCC is lenient about the statute of frauds,there must at least be something in writing to evidence the existence of a contract.
B) Yes,because Rita made no payment.
C) Yes,unless the good were specifically manufactured for Rita.
D) No,but only if Rita has made a payment under the contract.
E) No,because there has been partial-performance of the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Only the UCC covers offer and acceptance.
B) Only the UCC provides guidance in international litigation.
C) The CISG requirements for the statute of frauds are the same as those under the UCC.
D) The CISG requirements for the statute of frauds are more lenient than those under the UCC.
E) The UCC pre-empts the CISG because all states have adopted the UCC in some form.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The United Kingdom is not a signatory of the CISG and instead applies English common law.
B) Mexico has signed the CISG.
C) Israel is a signatory of the CISG.
D) The CISG is a treaty.
E) The United States applies the UCC but not the CISG.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Based upon the facts given,Emilia cannot recover because the coach was not a merchant in regards to the transaction and had not signed anything showing that he was to be charged for the caps.
B) Emilia can recover only if she can prove by testimony of a witness that the coach received the confirmation letter and read it.
C) Emilia can recover because she sent the coach a confirmation letter,and he did not object within 10 days of receipt.
D) Emilia can recover because she sent the coach a confirmation letter,and he did not object within 20 days of receipt.
E) Emilia can recover because the transaction was not covered by the UCC.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tangible
B) Saleable
C) Real
D) Movable
E) Merchandise
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A firm offer
B) An unenforceable offer
C) An illusory offer
D) A mirror offer
E) A consideration offer
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 89
Related Exams